Hello, my name is John–Phillips for those who might be confused. This being my first mark on the blog I wanted to introduce myself. If you have been in the store the last month or so, I am the new beard on the block trying to learn the ropes. I have greatly enjoyed working here so far and can say that my short time here has been better than most any job I have had in the past. I only anticipate it getting better as I continue to learn about the store, the people that work here and all of the pages that fill the walls.
A week or so ago I finished reading The Genius in All of Us by David Shenk. Because of the title, I was a bit suspect of the contents; but I was pleasantly surprised by the work once I got into it. David Shenk is a journalist has published five other books before this one concerning everything from chess in The Imortal Game, to Alzheimer’s disease in The Forgetting, and information technology in Data Smog and The End of Patience. In this particular book he did a wonderful job of compiling the work of experts and articulating this work for our benefit, especially for a subject that involves a vast amount of opinions and beliefs. In just over a hundred pages, and a hundred more or so in evidence and citations, he is able to speak clearly concerning this highly complex subject of “genius.”
It has long been the belief of many since the days of Gregor Mendel and his peas that genius or “giftedness” in any area is a direct product of the genes of their parents DNA. After all that is the reason a six year-old can play Chopin or professional athletes can run fast and jump high, right? It is this very presumption that Shenk takes by the horns arguing that genes are a leaping pad not a ceiling. He discusses the myths and sidetracks that caused the majority of the public to believe that they can’t only because they do not have the “gift.” For every sidetrack and presumption he has solid research and experiments to prove otherwise. He does a decent enough job of not telling everybody they are going to be the next Einstein or Lance Armstrong. You may not personally agree with all of his conclusions in the book, I didn’t, but as far as the primary point that genes do not completely determine one’s ability, he is solid; and it is an argument worth reading.
Coming from a background in music and art, I can say that there is a group of people that never bought into “giftedness” as success in the arts. That would be the masters themselves because they know that they are good at what they do not because they were given graceful hands or fast fingers or some magic force that allows them to draw, but it is because they practice. Practice, Practice, Practice. This is the main conclusion that the author points towards with fine research and pleasant narrative, all except for a misuse of Leonardo Da Vinci’s name every now and then; but hey, Dan Brown got away with it. This book is not an exhaustive study of genius or a complete explanation of why certain people do what they do; and Shenk does not say that everyone can be a master at everything, only that the majority of us are not living at the edge of our capabilities. Something I know is true in myself and something I wish to change. This book is a great spur to work hard at what you do, and not feel limited by what you believe are your “natural” limitations.
-John P.